Chapter II of Reynolds' The Seamstress begins with the beginning of the work day, the narrator noting that "the clock of St. Paul's, Convent Garden, is now striking seven, as Virginia rises from her humble pallet (3)," placing both the time, and the time's importance to Virginia explicitly before the reader. The importance time has for Virginia is immediately tied to her working life, with the narrator informing the reader of Virginia's exhausted condition by noting that "for, after twenty-one hours and a half of continuous, unwearied toil, four hours and a half of slumber were but the veriest shade and mockery of rest (3)!" Virginia is not only working a tremendous amount of time with very little rest, but the great deal of time she is working has led all of her life, including the hours in which she rests, to be regulated by and thought of in terms of hours. Hours, opposed to days, is how she experiences her life, an experience of life directly resultant from the wage system under which she labors.
In this way, The Seamstress, by way of Virginia's experience, is able to depict a way of experiencing time which would seem vastly different from that of characters encountered in other novels, characters often drawn from classes other than the laborers. In many of the works we have read up until now, time was measured in days and months, characters shown planning in terms which did not seem to divide individual days into smaller units. The Seamstress, however, offers the reader a different view of time, by extension allowing readers to immerse themselves in and articulate a critique of the realities facing workers. By presenting a world in which time passing in hours rather than days, readers may be able to more fully understand the ways in which measuring the day, even beyond the time spent working, in hours, and see how this conception of time works itself as a form of exploitation.
This different understanding of time presented by the novel can be seen as reflected on the formal level in the very tense in which it is written. As seen in the above quotes, much of the novel is written in present tense, opposed to the past tense which we've encountered up until now. Time, measured in hours, is shown as a constant of Virginia's. The very present in which Virginia lives is already divided up and measured as part of time, rather than becoming inscribed in time retrospectively, when told in past tense, as is oft to happen when one is measuring in larger units, such as days or months. Over the course of days and months, time is allowed to fall from focus of characters, only placed within a narrative across time when recounted. In this way, the very style employed in the writing, as well as what is being written about, offers the reader a chance at analyzing the different ways in which time is divided as a reflection of one's situation in life, providing a site in which to analyze time as a political category.
This is a really interesting observation. It has helped me see the way Reynolds uses quantitative measures to convey the extent of Virginia's oppression to readers -- poverty statistics, the economic analysis of making clothing, and now time.
ReplyDeleteDelmar,
ReplyDeleteI had noticed the mention of time, but I hadn’t thought about it so neatly. And it’s hard not to agree with you about the passage of time becoming a political statement about labor. As time is then labor as we see it pass through the chapter where she runs from one thing to the next with only about 4hours of sleep, we see Virginia’s time and labor juxtaposed to the labor and lack thereof of the people who send Virginia hither and thither. Each step of her journey, she meets with the next person who is gaining off her labor of the dress and then further gain off her labor and time by using her as the carrier for the dress, bill and the money. In this way, the whole system of production is laid out both before Virginia who collapses in tears at the final delivery, but also before the reader, who is told by Virginia’s reaction that perhaps they should do the same by the pure shame of the system of exploitation.
Delmar,
ReplyDeleteI also noticed the shifting tense within the narration. It was rather unsettling for me, but I do like your reading as it allows me to make sense of that element of the text. On a side note, having read your post, I had to think carefully whether you were also taking the class with Dr. Sizemore on Time Studies. If you remain interested in the issue of time, I can recommend a few texts concerning the rise of mechanical time in the 19th century, particularly in light of the mass-production of clocks at prices aimed at the middle and lower classes.