Trollope’s The Way We Live Now is largely concerned with the pernicious effect
of capitalism on who people are and the way they live. One of the profound
insights of the novel is that capitalism fundamentally shapes the character of society
and the disposition of individuals. Indeed, it is clear that what drives most
of the characters in The Way We Live Now
is nothing more than a desire for greater and greater wealth—in a word,
mammonism. The novel draws a clear connection between wealth—especially the
wealth illegally made through financial speculation and commercial enterprises—and
dishonesty or greed. The great temptation of the former in a growing capitalist
world is intrinsically linked to the pervasiveness of the latter in Victorian
society. But this does not answer the difficult question of why some allow this
temptation to consume them (e.g., Melmotte and Felix) while others do not (e.g.,
Roger Carbury). Is it simply a matter of moral integrity, of “honor,” or, as
Roger says early in the novel, having a sense of right and wrong?
Perhaps the
better question is whether the answer Trollope proposes in The Way We Live Now is that it amounts to a matter of moral integrity
or honor (I am not claiming that Trollope in fact proposes this but rather
offering it as food for thought). I think that this is a question worth
pursuing as we get deeper into the book. It is also one that the novel itself
seems to pose a few times right at the beginning. “Again, who shall say why
brother and sister had become so opposite each other,” the narrator asks with
regard to Felix and Henrietta, “whether they would have been thus different had
both been taken away as infants from their father’s and mother’s training, or
whether the girl’s virtues were owing altogether to the lower place which she
had held in her parent’s heart” (19). A few pages earlier, the narrator tells
us that Henrietta has been socialized to think that the contrast between her
and her brother was a product of gender difference: “Henrietta had been taught
to think that men in that rank of life in which she had been born always did
eat up everything” (16). Of course, the difference in “virtue” here between
Felix and Henrietta can be extended to other characters in the novel and
approached from a number of angles. I doubt that there is a simple answer to
this question, but it is one that I feel is nevertheless worth exploring, not
the least because mammonism and the dishonesty and greed that accompany it
still plague contemporary society. The critique that The Way We Live Now levels at the Victorian world is one that can certainly
be leveled at our own. What Trollope’s novel also shows is how meaning and
money are inextricable in a capitalist society (also a major problem today). One
would probably search in vain for a page on which money was not on some level
in question.
Andrew,
ReplyDeleteI would like to delve into this further in class. I'm no Marx scholar, but you're right, the critique of capitalism is unavoidable. What do we do with that?
This is an excellent question. How do you think age, social position, or degree of indebtedness play into it? And where would you place Paul Montague?
ReplyDelete