One
of the items that really struck me when I was reading The Seamstress was the difference in the portrayal of and attitude
towards Jewish characters as opposed to The
Way We Live Now and even other “middle-class” literature I’ve read from this
time period. This stands out most particularly in Chapter IX “The Three
Visitors.—The Catastrophe.” One of the men sent to Duke Belmont to collect on
his debt is described as
a tall, good-looking man, with that
peculiar facial outline which denotes the Hebrew race: he was well dressed, had
a gentlemanly appearance, and wore upon his features a certain air of frankness
and good-nature which is not usually ascribed by tale-writers to individuals of
his profession. The other two [men who accompanied him]were not of the Jewish
family: nor had they at least so far as personal appearance went, anything to
be proud of in that respect; —for their sinister countenances and ominous looks
contrasted strangely with the frank and open-hearted aspect of the Jew. (27)
Contrast
this with what we encountered with Breghert in The Way We Live Now or even the descriptions of Fagan in Oliver Twist or Mrs. Swarz in Vanity Fair. Even a passing familiarity with
the characters points to a negative portrayal of the characters by other
characters in the novel, if not by the narrator and/or author. While I am not
overly familiar with working-class literature, I find it interesting that the
stock-character version of the Jew is portrayed so differently and yet with
several similarities as well.
Breghert
is consistently shown as being respectful, even in the face of insult and
blatant antisemitism such as that displayed by Mr. Longstaffe, and the
character in The Seamstress is
similarly “properly respectful, without being servilely cringing or fawning”
(27). Both men are involved in money-matters, Breghert as a banker and Mr.
Solomon as a financial agent of sorts employed by Mr. Collinson. Furthermore,
it is the aristocracy/landed gentry which appear to hold the most hostility
towards Jewish characters. The Longstaffes and the Monograms look down upon
Georgiana’s attempted connection with Breghert and in The Seamstress, Duke Belmont “who was so proud—so haughty—and who
entertained such an aversion for the race which belongs to the individual to
home he was thus anxiously and earnestly imploring a boon” (28).
While
both texts portray their Jewish characters as being physically distinctive, Mr.
Solomon is still attractive, well dressed, and “had a gentlemanly appearance”
while Breghert is described as fat, not-well dressed, known for dying his
beard, and overall vulgar in appearance. Furthermore, Reynolds points several
times to the “aversion” of the upper-classes, implying that the lower classes (his
readers) do not possess the same aversion and as such are better than their
higher-ups. The same straightforward denunciations of anti-semitism do not, as
far as I can recall, appear in The Way We
Live Now or any of the other middle-class literature texts I’ve
encountered. That is not to say it does not occur, I have not read enough to
draw a sweeping conclusion, but I think it would be interesting to discuss and
consider the different class reactions to Jewishness and how they are
portrayed.
Great observations! Reynolds is almost invariably sympathetic to Jewish characters, especially in relation to aristocrats. There's a kind of loose identification with other marginalized and outcast social groups in much penny fiction. The difference you see in the description of Breghert is subtle but important.
ReplyDelete