Jaffe makes note of a couple of ideas that fascinate
me particularly in its connection with the idea of the definition of class and North and South. First, if I understand
Jaffe correctly, sympathy is an imaginative thought process where a
middle-class individual first sees a ‘degraded’ or dis-respectable member of
society, imagines themselves in their place, notices the tenuous distance
between one of their own position and that of the social pariah, and then
discovers sympathy as they recognize they could never be that person. In that
moment of dis-identification is first relief and then sympathy. This makes sense
in some regard because the overwhelming wealth of words people expended on
defining the middle-class speak to some form of identity crisis. They are
neither aristocrats nor beggars. In this large spectrum, who they are becomes
very important and a very important place for a power play. As Jaffe notes, “sympathy
in Victorian culture…is sympathy both for and against images of cultural
identity” (10). So sympathy becomes a way for the middle-class to separate
themselves out from the high and low classes. However, sympathy also seems to
imply other characteristics that might be meant to distinguish the
middle-class. First, this type of imaginative recognition and dis-recognition
requires critical thought and reflection, so they must be intelligent or
educated. Second, in coming to sympathy
for a ‘pathetic creature’ they might also have a sense of morality that moves
them to action, i.e. charity work. Third, and this one I’m less certain about,
they might demonstrate tolerance. In order to work and live in between classes
a certain level of tolerance, of understanding the other party is necessary.
However, they may be synonymous with sympathy to some extent.
Margaret is an interesting person of sympathy in this novel.
For while she is of the middle-class, raised by aristocracy, and used to having
sympathy with the poor as a clergyman’s daughter, who she must learn to have
sympathy with is the wealthy tradespeople of the North. However, I can’t quite
make her fit into Jaffe’s neat process in the reverse. While Margaret does
learn the ways of the North and even falls in love with a man of trade, she
never has to really identify herself as a tradeswoman since she inherits the money
and property. In essence, she converts Mr. Thorton to her identity. This
conversion to middle-class strikes me as one of the true middle-class ideals.
Hannah,
ReplyDeleteThe first two points about how sympathy speaks directly to being middle class are good, particularly the first about the necessity of education. I am unsure, however, of tolerance being a part of sympathy for two reasons. First, I don’t think tolerance is necessarily necessary because Margaret is able to come and go as she pleases among the working-class or even abstain altogether. Margaret enjoys the visits with Bessy and later with Nicholas, which is why I question calling it tolerance. Second, Margaret seems fairly intolerant of Thornton and her views through most of their relationship. While Thornton is on par with Margaret rather than below her socially, and thus doesn’t neatly fit into Jaffe’s argument, Thornton does represent a very different culture to Margaret’s southern, aristocratic upbringing. More specifically, Thornton represents a culture which Margaret looks down upon particularly for the filth and the broken men it produces. Again, while calling this culture “degraded” as compared to her own, might be a stretch, Margaret’s lack of sympathy towards Thornton might be worth exploring some.